[linux-dvb] Twinhan again, (Re: Help, failing to...)

["Sebastian Koenig" <privat@sekoenig.de>]

Hi,

On 27 Sep 2004 at 21:45, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> I have to admit, that the Twinhan one is the one with the worst
> quality. I would say about 40% less reception strength compared to the
> Kworld VSTREAM and the DiBcom reference device, which I also have. An
> owner of the Artec device reported good signal quality, too.
> 
> I heard that Twinhan released a new model of the VisionPlus USB and some
> users reported a better reception quality.

I should have read your mail before posting mine (Twinhan DVB-t USB-
Box). Are you referring to the Twinhan MagicBox? Does that mean it is
supported?

Having read your text above I'm actually considering to buy the 
Kworld model. But now there is another question: Are there 
differences in the USB speed? Sometimes I read about USB 2.0, 
sometimes not...

Sorry for posting all these (maybe stupid) questions, but I'm a bit 
confused about which device to buy.

Sebastian
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.sekoenig.de
http://www.profan2cpp.de
eMail: privat@sekoenig.de