[vdr] Re: Bug vdr-1.0.0pre5?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: Bug vdr-1.0.0pre5?
From: Andreas Schultz <aschultz@cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:58:19 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
In-Reply-To: <000401c1e56d$621b0b20$1801000a@simon>
References: <000401c1e56d$621b0b20$1801000a@simon>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org

On Tuesday 16 April 2002 19:37, Simon Dean wrote:
> > with another, that doesn't work. It's either _always_ VFAT=1 or
>
> _never_.
>
> Yes but wouldn't it be possible to alter this behaviour?  Why can't they
> READ each others directories?

what about creating a marker file in each vdr created recording directory that 
contains the type of the directory (VFAT or not) ?

BTW: could the VFAT stuff not also be made runtime selectable?

Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: Bug vdr-1.0.0pre5?
  - From: Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>

References:
- [vdr] Re: Bug vdr-1.0.0pre5?
  - From: "Simon Dean" <linux-dvb@sickhack.com>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: mp3-install
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: RealMagic Hollywood+ and VDR
Prev by thread: [vdr] Re: Bug vdr-1.0.0pre5?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: Bug vdr-1.0.0pre5?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index