Mailing List archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[vdr] Re: VDR-1.1.21+new driver+Conax 3.03 problems continued
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Bror Heinola wrote:
> Are you _absolutely_, _positively_ sure that your CAM is inserted in slot 0?
It's now in the lower slot (I have the 3.5" floppy version). If it's in
the upper slot, I get this: Jan 12 18:34:14 htpc vdr[29790]: CAM: no CAM
detected
Again, the old version works OK no matter where the CAM is inserted.
> These are CA descriptors being sent to your CAM. I really wonder why
> you didn't get any output in the log file for them. Are you sure that
> you have correctly enabled the debug output in eit.c (and re-compiled VDR)?
At this point I'm not sure about anything :)
[root@htpc VDR]# diff -u eit.c.old eit.c
--- eit.c.old 2003-01-12 02:44:33.000000000 +0200
+++ eit.c 2003-01-12 02:36:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -1026,14 +1026,12 @@
length = Length;
data = MALLOC(uchar, length);
memcpy(data, Data, length);
- /*//XXX just while debugging...
char buffer[1024];
char *q = buffer;
q += sprintf(q, "CAM: %04X %5d %4d", source, transponder, serviceId);
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
q += sprintf(q, " %02X", data[i]);
dsyslog(buffer);
- *///XXX
}
cCaDescriptor::~cCaDescriptor()
> Have you set the logging level to something other than the default value?
> You should set it to 3 to see the debugging output. Use the option '-l3'
> when running VDR.
Yes, I have -l3, it's just been missing in some (if not all) stuff I've
pasted here since it hasn't made any difference in output.
And I just double- and triplechecked. Nothing is printed to syslog,
but of course my changes to eit.c can be wrong. Afterall, I'm not a
programmer :)
--
Bror Heinola # +358-40-523-2171
count@iki.fi # +358-40-746-3053
--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index