[vdr] Re: VDR developer version 1.3.1

[Martin Neuditschko <yosuke.tomoe@gmx.net>]

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:44:09PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Martin Neuditschko wrote:
> > PS: I also think the autopid-patches for vdr-1.1.x, which I tested
> > some time ago, were working from me, but I am not really sure.
> 
> Could you try to find that out?

I tried vdr-1.1.33 with autopid-patch and it looks like it is
working (what means that no channels were invalidated by the patch,
but I don't know if the patch does really something / is working
in my environment)

The debugging output I got on the command line:
new transponder: 16384 314 v
new transponder: 16384 322 v
new transponder: 16384 378 v
new transponder: 16384 570 v
new transponder: 16384 810 v
new transponder: 16384 410 v
new transponder: 16384 346 v
new transponder: 16384 338 v
new transponder: 16384 362 v
new transponder: 16384 418 v
new transponder: 16384 330 v
new transponder: 16384 306 v
do renumber
setting pid 2 to 2624
setting pid 0 to 2625
setting pid 1 to 2624
set pid's to: V: 2624, A: 2625, P: 0
setting pid 3 to 2626
setting pid 0 to 2625
setting pid 1 to 2624
setting pid 2 to 2624
setting pid 3 to 2626
setting pid 2 to 2496
setting pid 0 to 2497
setting pid 1 to 2496
set pid's to: V: 2496, A: 2497, P: 0
setting pid 3 to 2498
setting pid 0 to 2497
setting pid 1 to 2496
[snip]

Also the scanner was working correctly as I see.
The log including running of the scanner-plugin is avaliable at:
http://ytomoe.dyndns.org/vdr.log

best regards
Martin Neuditschko


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.