[vdr] Re: Feature request: AF independence for vdr.

["Adrian P Challinor" <adrian.challinor@osiris.co.uk>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of
> DOm
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:40 PM
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] Re: Feature request: AF independence for vdr.
> 
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:19:09 +0200
> Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de> wrote:
> 
> > DOm wrote:
> > >
> > > Hallo,
> > >
> > > i'm studying a little IPv6 and i'll try to port vdr to IPv6 adopting
> > > an AF (Address family) independent approach as suggested in
> > > http://www.kame.net/newsletter/19980604/
> > > any chance to have some help ? I'm not a great programmer :)
> >
> > Just to let you know: I hate IPv6...
> 
> I hate NAT much more (i'm going off-topic, i know).
> You are really free to hate v6 :) but AF independence doesn't drop IPv4
> support, _my_code_  probly will...
> 
> Bye,
>    Angelus.
> 
> 

Hmm, given that most of the world still uses IPv4, why do you want to drop
it? 

Adrian Challinor
(Standards are a wonderful thing - there are so many to choose from)




-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.