[vdr] Re: AW: Aborted - a test case

[s.huelswitt@gmx.de (Stefan Huelswitt)]

On 13 Sep 2004 dominik.strasser@epost.de wrote:

> This backtrace seconds my theory. operator new tries to allocate, malloc
> fails. new throws the xmem exception which is not caught anywhere, so terminate
> is called. The default implementation for terminate is to call abort().
> To fix this problem, an exception handler should be introduced which prevents
> vdr from aborting. 

I don't agree fully. First we have to find out why vdr tries to
alloc so huge memory areas from a only 692 byte long section.

Regards.

-- 
Stefan Huelswitt
s.huelswitt@gmx.de  | http://www.muempf.de/