[vdr] Re: Thread-safe poison and the standard C++ library

[Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>]

In <200502010655.53975.taferner@kde.org>, Stefan Taferner wrote:

> On Monday 31 January 2005 23:51, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > I have to disable the thread-safe poison pragmas when compiling the
> > softdevice plugin because there are references to several unsafe
> > functions. The strange things is, these references are in the standard
> > C++ library, included via DFB++. Does the rest of VDR generally avoid
> > the SCL, or at least those parts of it?
> 
> It works if you poison after including the standard header files.
> Most of the time shuffling the include order helps.

Duh, how many times have I read about that here? :-/ Thanks for your
patience.

softdevice patch attached (for latest CVS, probably works with older
versions).

-- 
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk
--- softdevice.c.orig	2005-02-03 00:10:14.000000000 +0000
+++ softdevice.c	2005-02-03 00:17:08.000000000 +0000
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
 
 #include <getopt.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
+
+// Pre-include iostream to avoid being caught by poison
+#include <iostream>
+
 #include <vdr/interface.h>
 #include <vdr/plugin.h>
 #include <vdr/player.h>
--- video-dfb.c.orig	2005-02-03 00:17:50.000000000 +0000
+++ video-dfb.c	2005-02-03 00:18:24.000000000 +0000
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/ioctl.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
+
+// Pre-include iostream to avoid being caught by poison
+#include <iostream>
+
 #include <vdr/plugin.h>
 #include "video-dfb.h"
 #include "utils.h"