[linux-dvb] Re: CA_ZAP/DVB libs
manu at kromtek.com
Thu Jul 7 21:13:06 CEST 2005
Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 19:01, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>Andrew de Quincey wrote:
>>>On Thursday 07 July 2005 18:09, Manu Abraham wrote:
>>>>Andrew de Quincey wrote:
>>>>>Well here is my opinion:
>>>>>Should we have "one library to rule them all", or split it into seperate
>>>>>sublibraries? Having seperate libraries is cleaner architecturally, but
>>>>>might be overkill... anyone have any really good arguments either way?
>>>>Having sublibraries will keep confusion to an utmost maximum,
>>>I assume you mean minimum here :)
>>Sure no doubt .. I am not saying we need to have a lib for everything,
>>but we are at a position where we do not know exactly, what DVB hardware
>>might look like at all.. :-) So we should have some sort of a generic
>>base on which future expansions could be done, rather than pulling it
>>apart everytime something has to be done. Even if it would have to be
>>done, in a split way, the effort required there would be minimal.
>>A possible way i considered was,
>>1) a parser
>>2) conditional access (Common Interface or UnCommon Interface) ;-)
>>4) api specific
> I have one other to add to that - misc shared utilities... I've been doing
> some exploratory work with dvbsak, and I've put "bitstream" in there since
> its nice and generic. I've also extracted the dvbcfg_util string parsing
> stuff and moved it there as well.
On second thoughts, well if it would simplify the configs stuff, well
why not ?
depends how you would like to look at it ..
More information about the linux-dvb