[linux-dvb] Partially resolved HDTV5 lite and Twinhan DST together
+ dst module question
mkrufky at linuxtv.org
Wed Oct 12 19:51:26 CEST 2005
Manu Abraham wrote:
> GFarris wrote:
>> I finally was able to get my computer to boot without locking up
>> while both the HDTV5 lite and the Twinhan DST (MOT) are installed by
>> switching pci slots with each other, and then doing:
>> bttv i2c_hw=1 card=0x71
>> However, now analog doesn't work with any of the usual programs. If
>> I re-scan, it only finds the channels it was last tuned to. If I
>> pull out the Twinhan, then analog works again. Weird.
> Probably it was writing to the dst (i2c) instead of the HDTV5. It
> should not be writing to the DST, the DST tunes properly in that case ?
> probably Michael Krufky can comment on the HDTV5, since he was working
> on the HDTV5 lite. Michael any thoughts ?
>> Also, I'd rather have the lite as the first card so I don't have to
>> specify the card # since I use it more than the Twinhan.
>> Anyway, I don't understand how dst by itself, or with dvb-bt8xx can
>> work, since the Twinhan always barfs without the i2c_hw=1 parm.
Hmm... Looks like the Twinhan barfs without the i2c_hw=1 parm, but in my
experience FusionHDTV5 Lite barfs WITH the i2c_hw=1 parm.
I'm not sure what i2c_hw=1 does, nor did I do any research on it. What
I do know, is that modprobing dvb-bt8xx alone is enough to get
FusionHDTV5 Lite to work. (dvb-bt8xx will automatically load up bt878
and bttv modules)
Maybe the proper fix to make these cards work together would be to cause
FusionHDTV5 Lite to ignore the i2c_hw=1 parm. Manu, what do you think?
More information about the linux-dvb