[linux-dvb] Kernel locking in dst
Sigmund Augdal Helberg
sigmund at snap.tv
Wed Oct 19 09:23:06 CEST 2005
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:33 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
>
>
> On 10/18/05, Sigmund Augdal Helberg <sigmund at snap.tv> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:39 +0200, Henrik Sjoberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am playing a bit with getting MythTV to talk high level
> CI. However, I
> > have come to a problem in the dst/dst_ca drivers. MythTV
> have different
> > threads running for tuning frequency and doing ca-stuff.
> This makes me get
> > simultaneous frontend and ca calls device. However, in the
> dst driver
> > these two things both end up in i2c communiation with the
> card which
> > interfere with each other.
> >
> > As you can understand this does not work good since there
> are no locking
> > mechanism in dst. Is this something that is to go into the
> driver or
> > something that should be done on a higher level ( e.g.
> between all
> > components in an dvb-adapter)? I guess it should be taken
> care of by the
> > driver, since it is the only one that knows when locking is
> needed, but I
> > just want to check.
>
> I've played around to make vlc speak high level CI. I have
> code that I'm
> fairly confident makes correct capmt messages, but it only
> works once in
> a while. I have all sorts of strange behaviour. Some times the
> system
> gets in a state where tuning does not work (no calls report
> any errors,
> but the received mux does not change). unloading and reloading
> the
> driver fixes this. Some times the dst.session struct get
> messed up so
> that the dst_ca belive has_session is set while it actually is
> not. And
> even other times the cam or card or smartcard or something
> gets stuck in
> a state where any call to the ca device return just garbage.
> This
> sometimes solves itself after a minute or two, and other times
> I need a
> cold boot to get it working again. I was under the impression
> that this
> had to be caused by a memory corrution caused by a buffer
> overflow in
> the i2c trafic(because increasing the size *_buf fields in the
> state
> struct stoped the has session flag from being corrupted, but
> perhaps
> this is the cause of my problems as well?
>
>
> Few weeks back, i had fixed a possible buffer overlow situation, Are
> you talking about that ? If you are not with the updated with the
> latest change. Well that was the last change that i had..
> Maybe you can check it again, incase you are not updated with the
> latest. Maybe you can try the patch too, to check whether it helps
> you in some manner.
I have unfortunatly had way to many things to do lately, so I haven't
gotten around to testing this lately. Meaning my tree is a bit outdated.
When I get a spare moment I will try to connect everything up again and
try a recent tree, and possibly the patch as well. Just out of
curriosity, could you point me to the file/revision where this fix is,
so I can have a look at the diff?
Thanks
Sigmund
>
>
> Regards,
> Manu
>
More information about the linux-dvb
mailing list