[linux-dvb] [PATCH] Bug in section filtering (and fix)

Manu Abraham abraham.manu at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 15:25:15 CEST 2005


Michael Krufky wrote:

> Jeremy Hall wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the new year, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ??? huh?
>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 C.Y.M wrote:
>>>
>>>> Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> just to let you know that this report and fix is highly appreciated,
>>>>> but I simply am short of time and didn't have time to look into
>>>>> the details to verify your fix. It won't drop off my TODO-list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would be cool if someone else had the time...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did anyone decide if this patch should be commited?
>>>
>>>
>>> I was away for a while and didn't have time yet to look into this.
>>>
>>> I'm also somewhat disappointed that no one else wants
>>> to look into this :-(
>>
>>
>> oh I looked into it, and I reported back that it was GREAT!
>>
>> I was wondering why it didn't get committed.
>
>
> I have tried this patch also, and all I can report is that it didnt 
> break anything, nor did it cause any improvements that I can visibly 
> detect.  Looking at the patch by eye seems to make sense, but I didnt 
> have the time to look any deeper into it.
>
> Jeremy, can you share your experience with us in a little more detail 
> , most specifically, tell us why you think this is 'GREAT' ?  Such a 
> comment makes me think that you noticed a world of difference after 
> applying it... A little elaboration might be all we need to decide on 
> applying this.
>
> IMHO, this is probably okay to commit to cvs.
>

It sounds quite logical.. It wouldn't break anything too. Probably the 
best to test this patch would be on lowbitrate streams on satellites 
like Hotbird .. ;-) It shouldn't make any difference otherwise. My 
antenna which was pointing at Hotbird, went down in a wind a while back, 
and i haven't replaced it yet.


Manu





More information about the linux-dvb mailing list