[linux-dvb] [PATCH] bt878 driver update
js at linuxtv.org
Mon Sep 5 12:05:06 CEST 2005
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 Edgar Toernig wrote:
> below is a patch against the 2.6.13 dvb code to fix some
> problems I had with a Pinnacle PCTV-Sat, mainly the fifo
> overrun errors.
> I've added some error recovery that works often but is
> pretty noisy. The best result is to simply not enable
> those status interrupts. Due to resyncs added to the
> risc-code the dma-controller seems to always recover
> from fifo overruns. To get all status irqs back one has
> to set bt878_debug now.
> Further, I've added a sleep function which turns off the
> IF-relay. So now it's possible to connect another receiver
> to the IF-out connector and when the card is not used (for
> 5 seconds) the external box gets the antenna.
> The new relay handling also fixes a problem when trying to
> use analog video-in and dvb at the same time. Formerly,
> at the moment you open the video dev the relay was turn
> off and the frontend got no signal any more. That works
> correct now - you can watch digital and analog tv at the
> same time.
> And then there are a couple of cleanups - code, comments,
> whitespaces, error checks, log levels, ...
> Comments welcome ...
It is unadvisable to mix cleanups and other changes in one patch.
Ideally you would send multiple small patches, one for each
logically seperate change, e.g.:
- fifo overrun error recovery
- IF-relay stuff
- formatting / whitespace changes
- other cleanups
Yes, I realize how much work it is to split a patch this way.
BTW, have you looked at linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches?
> PS: Do I have to sends the couple of lines that touch the
> bttv driver to the bttv-maintainer or is anyone collecting
> dvb-related bttv patches and forwards them?
If the changes depend on each other it doesn't make sense
to split the patch this way. Just send it to both linux-dvb
and video4linux-list and see who'll pick it up.
More information about the linux-dvb