[linux-dvb] Re: [PATCH] Kworld-ATSC110
maillist
maillist at boilerbots.com
Thu Feb 16 04:03:36 CET 2006
Michael Krufky wrote:
> maillist wrote:
>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User cmeyers at ford.site
>> # Node ID c433d5da9fe9095c4fb4861106d82b1c33ec44e3
>> # Parent 55f98daf92cfa71671b9bd6b4168a6fe99a8f438
>> Verified Kworld-ATSC110
>>
>> I corrected the composite input and verified the S-video. I also
>> verified the audio mux.
>
>
> I am applying THIS part to my tree. I'll assume this means that
> you've tested both svideo AND composite.
>
Yes, I tested all inputs and they all work with the patch I sent to you.
>>
>> Currently I am only able to receive ATSC HD content, not sure why QAM
>> is not working.
>
>
> What do you mean QAM is not working? You mean it is untested, right?
> If VSB is working for you, then QAM will work too -- I have similar
> hardware (nxt2004, tuv1236d, saa7135) and have tested this myself.
> Chances are, the QAM testing may have been done using encrypted
> channels, which wouldnt work anyway.
>
I have basic cable and have been told by my neighbors that there is
unencrypted QAM for all the local channels on Comcast in San Jose. I
tried using atscscan and it doesn't find anything when I give it the
QAM256 freq. table. Is there something more you are doing? I also
switched my cable to the other antenna input but still no lock, nothing.
>>
>> No radio functionality, probably something in the tuv1236D driver.
>
>
> There IS no driver for TUV1236D -- it is a simple, hybrid
> tuner,supported by tuners.ko (and dvb-pll). The radio functionality
> is built-in. Does it just not work? Do you know for sure that the
> radio feature is available with this card? Andrew Burri had included
> this with his original patch.... Andrew?
>
Well Kworld doesn't say anything about it but the TUV1236D module seems
to support it as claimed in their product flier. Is there a specific
module that should be loaded to support radio? With my other bttv boards
the radio works without any extra modules.
>>
>> diff -r 55f98daf92cf -r c433d5da9fe9
>> linux/drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-cards.c
>> --- a/linux/drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-cards.c Wed Feb 15
>> 02:19:47 2006 -0500
>> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-cards.c Wed Feb 15
>> 02:56:12 2006 -0800
>> @@ -2743,29 +2743,22 @@ struct saa7134_board saa7134_boards[] =
>> .radio_type = UNSET,
>> .tuner_addr = ADDR_UNSET,
>> .radio_addr = ADDR_UNSET,
>> - .tda9887_conf = TDA9887_PRESENT,
>
>
> WHY do you remove this? I am 100% sure that tda9887 is present inside
> the "tin can." do:
>
> "dmesg | grep tda988" while this is enabled and that will prove it to
> you.
>
Nope, I never get any confirmation message from the tda9887 driver. I
hack around the tda9887 and tried probing additional i2c addresses but
it can not locate anything. I have never seen any official confirmation
anywhere that the tda9887 is present. It would be good for someone who
has the tuv1236D documents to speak up and help out. I am trying to get
this information from Philips but NDAs have to be signed because of the
ATI nxt2004 part and this is a pain in the ass. Instead I think I might
borrow a PCI bus analyzer from work tomorrow and see what I can find
out. I am going to try and capture the nxt2004 firmware that is loaded
from the Kworld driver.
>> .mpeg = SAA7134_MPEG_DVB,
>> .inputs = {{
>> .name = name_tv,
>> .vmux = 1,
>> .amux = TV,
>> .tv = 1,
>> -#if 0
>> - /* these inputs are untested */
>> - },{
>> - .name = name_comp1, /* not yet verified */
>> - .vmux = 4, /* a later patch by
>> - * Curt Meyers <cmeyers at boilerbots.com>
>> - * uses .vmux = 3,
>> - */
>> - .amux = LINE2,
>> - },{
>> - .name = name_svideo, /* not yet verified */
>> - .vmux = 8,
>> - .amux = LINE2,
>> -#endif
>> - }},
>> -#if 0
>> + },{
>> + .name = name_comp1,
>> + .vmux = 3,
>> + .amux = LINE2,
>> + },{
>> + .name = name_svideo,
>> + .vmux = 8,
>> + .amux = LINE2,
>> + }},
>> +#if 0 // The TUV1236D supports FM radio but don't know how to
>> activate it.
>> .radio = {
>> .name = name_radio,
>> .amux = LINE1,
>>
>>
> Please include a Sign-off on all future patches. This change that I'm
> about to apply is also present in your previous patch, so I will pull
> your S-O-B that way, but in the future, please include it explicitly.
>
Sorry, every project has rules and it is hard to keep all these details
straight.
Curt
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
More information about the linux-dvb
mailing list