[vdr] cBitmap::Dirty isn't working
Luca Olivetti
luca at ventoso.org
Tue Apr 19 19:28:42 CEST 2005
Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Reinhard Nissl wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Luca Olivetti wrote:
>>
>>> I've also noticed that the xine plugin doesn't bother to copy only
>>> the changed areas, it copies the whole bitmaps in each Flush, I
>>> didn't check softdevice.
>>
>>
>>
>> Which version of vdr-xine did you check?
>
>
> 0.7.2
>
>> vdr-xine uses the dirty area for quite a long time.
>
>
> You're (obviusly ;-) right, I misinterpreted the unconditional call to
> SendWindow as a full bitmap copy, while the check for Dirty is made
> inside SendWindow. I'll have to investigate more where the problem comes
> from.
Well, /me doesn't understand :-(
After forcing the femon plugin to use 3 areas (with xine it would use
just one covering the entire screen), I can see that if I use xine I get
the correct values in Dirty (21 for "Transponder information", 17 for
"Stream information" and 21 right before clearing the title) while with
the dxr3 I don't (get the last 21).
Since both xine osd and dxr3 osd take the drawing methods straight from
cOsd[*] I'm really lost seeing the different results.
[*] I saw that you redefined them then called the base one like, e.g.:
eOsdError cXineOsd::SetAreas(const tArea *Areas, int NumAreas)
{
cMutexLock osdLock(&m_osdMutex);
return cOsd::SetAreas(Areas, NumAreas);
}
I tried doing the same to see if using the mutex made the difference but
it didn't.
Bye
--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---------------------------------------------------------------
EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20050419/e692e696/signature.pgp
More information about the vdr
mailing list