[vdr] cRemux single threaded?

[Klaus Schmidinger]

Udo Richter wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> 
>>> Well, we could introduce
>>>
>>>   cRemux::SetTimeouts(int PutTimeout, int GetTimeout) { 
>>> resultBuffer->SetTimeouts(PutTimeout, GetTimeout); }
>>>
>>> Klaus
>>
>>
>> Haven't gotten any response on this suggestion so far.
>> Would this solve your problem?
> 
> 
> Oh, sorry.
> Yes, of course, this would work. My current workaround is to gain access 
> using dirty tricks, so this is welcome. Access to Available() may be 
> useful too. Or, for a bigger rewrite, what about making class cRemux : 
> public cRingBufferLinear?

cRemux::Get() returns the number of currently available bytes.

Klaus