[vdr] A difference b/n vdr-1.3.26-enAIO-2.3.diff and vdr-1.3.27-enAIO-2.3.diff

C.Y.M syphir at syphir.sytes.net
Mon Jun 20 05:57:04 CEST 2005


Starting with vdr-1.3.26, the recording date in VDR uses DD-MM-YY, instead of
just DD-MM.  When I compare the latest enAIO patch for vdr-1.3.27 with the
previous patch for vdr-1.3.26, it looks like the array has gone back to the
original size of 6.  Is this correct?


+--- vdr-1.3.26/recording.c     2005-06-05 07:11:45.000000000 -0700
++++ vdr-1.3.27/recording.c        2005-06-19 08:06:39.000000000 -0700
 @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
  #endif
  #define INFOFILESUFFIX    "/info.vdr"
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@
 +     else {
 +        struct tIndex { int offset; uchar type; uchar number; short reserved; };
 +        tIndex *index;
-+        char RecLength[21], RecDate[6], RecTime[6], RecDelimiter[2];
++        char RecLength[21], RecDate[9], RecTime[6], RecDelimiter[2];
 +        if (Setup.ShowRecLength) {
 +           char *filename = NULL;
 +           int last = -1;

Best Regards,
C.



More information about the vdr mailing list