[vdr] Softdevice or Xine?
Jouni Karvo
jouni.karvo at tkk.fi
Fri Oct 7 07:50:09 CEST 2005
hi,
Darren Salt writes:
> > The reason why a separate xine is nice is that currently the setup eats up
> > all the CPU cycles. [...]
>
> Hmm? I'm seeing around 30% CPU usage with gxine (2GHz Athlon, Radeon 9200,
> 266MHz bus, AGP 4x).
>
<...>
>
> Something's evidently not right with your setup. Are you using Xv? Have you
> tried the native R200 support in a recent 2.6 kernel and X?
Finally, after upgrading to 2.6.13.2, I found the problem! (what a
relief) After upgrading, the CPU cycles were properly reported and
top gave the crucial hint...
FYI:
If you start xine in background directly from init scripts with
--stdctl it seems to hog all your spare CPU cycles. Removing this
(unnecessary in this case) option did drop CPU usage from constant
100% to a total of about 20%.
yours,
Jouni
More information about the vdr
mailing list