[vdr] streamdev-client -- doesn't connect to streamdev-server
--> "Channel not available"
syrius.ml at no-log.org
syrius.ml at no-log.org
Thu Sep 29 17:07:16 CEST 2005
Thomas Glomann <mailinglists at glomann.de> writes:
> On Thursday 29 September 2005 13:05, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> En/na Thomas Glomann ha escrit:
>> > now I can watch TV on my laptop via wlan :)
>>
>> You can do that also with the networked xine plugin
>>
>> Bye
>
> Hm. What are the pros and cons of networked-xine and streamdev-xine?
hmm i'd say
networked-xine:
pros:
+ vdr-xine is actively developped and supported, the network patch is
a simple hack.
+ only one vdr setup
+ fast channel switching
+ very stable.
cons:
- only accept one viewer. you can't have 2 xine-ui processes
connecting to vdr
- fastforward/etc seems to be a bit laggy/buggy. (don't know if it
happens with original vdr-xine)
streamdev:
pros:
+ provides http and vtp streams
+ you can have more than one view at the same time
cons:
- the author hasn't too much time to work on it at the moment.
- for vtp, you need several vdr setups. far too much things are
duplicated in that case. on the vdr-streamdev-client you can add
timers on the vdr-server but you have to use a special menu. if you
press record in the schedule menu on a client the recording will be
made on the client (and it's not configurable) imho it's not
optimal.
- not very stable, especially with several viewers.
i use both plugins but mainly vdr-networked_xine.
Unfortunatly both don't work that well when used at the same time
ex: vdr-networked_xine live watching is stopped when you start a
http stream.
Anyway both plugins are essential to me. thanks again to the authors !
--
More information about the vdr
mailing list