[vdr] tunerlock with alternate primary device

[Klaus Schmidinger]

Udo Richter wrote:
> C.Y.M wrote:
> 
>> If I define PrimaryDVB = 2 in setup.conf and enable 
>> WAIT_FOR_TUNER_LOCK, it
>> seems VDR checks for primary device = 1 first.  Should VDR not start 
>> with the
>> primary device defined by the setup.conf first?
>>
>> vdr: [6153] ERROR: device 1 has no lock, can't attach receiver!
> 
> 
> Sure that this is the same numbering?
> The 'has no lock' error reports the CardIndex, while PrimaryDVB is a 
> device index. I'm not sure, but I think that using -D may change the 
> ordering for device index, but not CardIndex.

The numbering is the same in both cases:

device.c:     esyslog("ERROR: device %d has no lock, can't attach receiver!", CardIndex() + 1);

Klaus