[vdr] Any really working HD video output systems for VDR?
mattia at technologist.com
Thu Jun 11 11:00:29 CEST 2009
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 00:50 +0200, Georg Acher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Mattia Rossi wrote:
> > Is there any other setting we can work on regarding the eHd outputs,
> > even if they are not listed in the reelbox-3 setup ?
> Not really. You can either use upscaling without deinterlacing (and get
> tearing for real interlaced moving signals) or use the chips "deinterlacer".
> That is effectively independent scaling of both fields, so the field order
> is correct, but fine details show horizontal ghost lines as the
> interpolation doesn't know anything about the full context. It depends a bit
> on the display how visible these lines can be seen, some displays seem to
> have their own filtering and hide them better.
Ok, will try to improve a little bit on the display side (i.e. bring my
test machine to a couple of friend's houses and test with different
VPRs, plasmas). I haven't found much documentation for my particular
hardware, but it looks like scaling from 480i and 576i isn't really what
it is best at ....
> There is a third possibility that is currently not settable: Blending. That
> mixes both fields together. So still pictures are sharp and movements are
> "only" blurred and not teared. I can enable it in a "experimental"
That would be great, and if you manage to get a test build I would be
willing to experiment
> BTW: We chose the DeCypher despite "a real" deinterlacer was missing at the
> time, because we were told that it will be enabled later. The rest is
Alas, that happens too often with manufacturers
> You can output 576i over HDMI and let the display do the deinterlacing. But
> there is a dependency with the analog output that allows only 576p when the
> analog port should emit 576i (CVBS etc.). For 576i over HDMI you need to
> switch the analog port completely off.
> I guess the vdr 1.7 has it's own intelligence about frame-precise playback
> for TS that doesn't match the requirements of the plugin... It took us quite
> a while to make it work almost as responsive as on the FF, maybe there are
> some dependencies with our "old" 1.4. But up to now, I had no time to try
Well, while this looks like a show stopper for other users, it really
isn't for me (and my users) since we mainly use the skip fwd and skip
backward functions when replaying
Thanks and regards
More information about the vdr