[vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today
Klaus.Schmidinger at cadsoft.de
Fri Mar 6 15:52:03 CET 2009
On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger
> <Klaus.Schmidinger at cadsoft.de <mailto:Klaus.Schmidinger at cadsoft.de>> wrote:
> On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> > Hello,
> > just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
> > fails if I don't use this :
> > --- vdr.c~ 2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100
> > +++ vdr.c 2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > #include <pwd.h>
> > #include <signal.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <sys/capability.h>
> > #include <sys/prctl.h>
> > #include <termios.h>
> vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of
> v4l-dvb from
> linuxtv.org <http://linuxtv.org> (6bd427caa0cb).
> I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in
> However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still
> persists with the current version.
> Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?
> I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 184.108.40.206
> Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile:
> DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES
Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here.
There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by
adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 220.127.116.11).
That one has nothing to do with the driver.
@Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there
any patches involved?
Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?
@Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the
one I reported?
More information about the vdr