[vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

[Klaus Schmidinger]

On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger
> <Klaus.Schmidinger at cadsoft.de <mailto:Klaus.Schmidinger at cadsoft.de>> wrote:
> 
>     On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
>     > Hello,
>     >
>     > just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
>     > fails if I don't use this :
>     >
>     > --- vdr.c~      2009-01-18 12:02:37.000000000 +0100
>     > +++ vdr.c       2009-03-03 22:17:49.000000000 +0100
>     > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>     >  #include <pwd.h>
>     >  #include <signal.h>
>     >  #include <stdlib.h>
>     > +#include <linux/types.h>
>     >  #include <sys/capability.h>
>     >  #include <sys/prctl.h>
>     >  #include <termios.h>
> 
>     vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of
>     v4l-dvb from
>     linuxtv.org <http://linuxtv.org> (6bd427caa0cb).
> 
>     I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in
> 
>      http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html
> 
>     However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still
>     persists with the current version.
> 
>     Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?
> 
> I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19
> 
> Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile:
> DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES

Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here.
There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by
adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20).
That one has nothing to do with the driver.

@Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there
any patches involved?
Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?

@Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the
one I reported?

Klaus