[vdr] Record with 1.7.4 or 1.7.5 and iptv

Rolf Ahrenberg rahrenbe at cc.hut.fi
Fri May 1 09:25:30 CEST 2009


On Fri, 1 May 2009, Senufo wrote:

> TF1;IPTV:1:IPTV|S1P1|UDP|232.0.1.17|8200:P:0:1217=27:1317:0:0:1017:0:0:0

# scants TF1.raw 2>/dev/null
PAT:
    0: sid=0x03f9 pmt_pid=0x045d
PMT:  sid=0x03f9 pcr=0x04c1 vpid=0x04c1 [h264] apid=0x0525 [mpeg2audio]
0x0525: MPEG Audio, layer2, 48000 Hz, 128 kbits/s, stereo
0x04c1: H264 profile=Main level=3.0 sps=0 poc=0 ref=4 544x576 PIC-AFF
SDT:
    0: sid=0x03f9 name='TF1' provider='France Telecom'
0x04c1:  gop_len: min=3 max=64 avg=45.6

> France 2;IPTV:2:IPTV|S1P1|UDP|232.0.1.1|8200:P:0:1201=27:1301=fra:0:0:1001:0:0:0

# scants France2.raw 2>/dev/null
PAT:
    0: sid=0x03e9 pmt_pid=0x044d
PMT:  sid=0x03e9 pcr=0x04b1 vpid=0x04b1 [h264] apid=0x0515 [mpeg2audio]
0x0515: MPEG Audio, layer2, 48000 Hz, 128 kbits/s, stereo
0x04b1: H264 profile=Main level=3.0 sps=0 poc=0 ref=4 544x576 PIC-AFF
SDT:
    0: sid=0x03e9 name='France 2' provider='FT'
0x04b1:  gop_len: min=10 max=56 avg=47.2

> I can only record TF1 and France 2.
> With IPTV configured with filters on

Both streams seem to be valid. You've enable both PID and NID scanners 
on for working channels, but these should be disabled by default (enable 
pid scanner only if you don't get the live video and sid scanner if you 
don't get EPG). The "Use section filtering" option should be enabled and 
"Disable filter" option should NOT contain "PAT (0x00)" entry. Please, 
verify these.

"Use section filtering: Define whether the section filtering shall be 
used. Section filtering means that IPTV plugin tries to parse and 
provide VDR with secondary data about the currently active stream. VDR 
can then use this data for providing various functionalities such as 
automatic pid change detection and EPG etc. Enabling this feature does 
not affect streams that do not contain section data."

"Disable filter: Define an ill-behaving filter to be blacklisted."

The next thing to debug would be: Does cPatFilter::Process() get any 
data and why is a wrong value set to Vtype?

BR,
--
rofa



More information about the vdr mailing list