On 19 September 2010 11:28, Gavin Hamill <gdh at acentral.co.uk> wrote: > :) > > It was precisely the numbering/grouping I was after - at the moment I have > the similar output from 'scan' but was hoping to avoid cut/paste pain... > > Thanks anyway - that site is a good resource. Sorry :-) This might help you with the numbering: http://www.wildsat.com/