[vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

Klaus Schmidinger Klaus.Schmidinger at tvdr.de
Tue Apr 23 12:41:24 CEST 2013

On 22.04.2013 13:30, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Al 22/04/13 11:12, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit:
>>> virtual void Recalc(int Number)
>>>     ///<Store the current position in a satellite position with the given
>>> Number
>>>     ///<and recalculate all other positions relative to this one
>> What would this actually be good for?
> Imagine that the dish moved but the counter didn't work, or simply
> there's some slack accumulated, so the actual position and the
> registered position differ.
> Without this method you should store each of the already stored
> position, with a Recalc method, positioning to one know good satellite
> would be enough, since the relatives positions would still be good.
> Actually, the description is wrong, as the effect would be "You,
> positioner, now are at this position", so it would be something like
> "Set as your current position the position specified by Number"
> (or longitude if you prefer)
> So maybe it should be better called "SetCurrentPosition"

The specs on the 0x6F command are a little vague.
What do you suggest should be sent to a DiSEqC rotor?
Something like

   6F nn 00 00

where 'nn' is the number of the satellite position the dish currently
actually points to?


More information about the vdr mailing list