[vdr] Deactivate a Tuner

Brian-Imap Brian_Dorling at t-online.de
Thu Aug 15 17:37:56 CEST 2013


On 8/14/2013 10:16 PM, Arthur wrote:
> 14.08.2013 19:01, Brian-Imap kirjutas:
>> On 8/11/2013 11:43 AM, Brian-Imap wrote:
>>> On 8/8/2013 10:22 PM, Lars Hanisch wrote:
>>>> Am 08.08.2013 16:23, schrieb Brian-Imap:
>>>>> On 8/7/2013 9:58 PM, Lars Hanisch wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 07.08.2013 21:04, schrieb Brian-Imap:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> I now a have a 4 Tuner Cine S2 setup that I want to run with 3
>>>>>>> cables, I want to keep the fourth cable for a test VDR.
>>>>>>> Reading about this I only see how to do it together with the
>>>>>>> Dynamite Plugin, is that correct that I must use that
>>>>>>> Plugin to get it to work for VDR?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am currently running a plain VDR setup on Ubuntu, with very few
>>>>>>> plugins and had no need for the Dynamite Plugin
>>>>>>> up till now.
>>>>>>   You don't really need dynamite. If you want to omit the fourth
>>>>>> tuner (in kernel count order), you can start vdr with
>>>>>> the -D parameter (see vdr --help).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   vdr -D0 -D1 -D2 <other parameters as usual>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Lars.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers Brian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> vdr mailing list
>>>>>>> vdr at linuxtv.org
>>>>>>> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> vdr mailing list
>>>>>> vdr at linuxtv.org
>>>>>> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>>>>> Hi Lars,
>>>>>
>>>>> OK I knew about this, but I thought that the Card/Tuners numbers
>>>>> could change
>>>>> from boot to boot. Are you saying that they will not change?
>>>>   If it's one bridge with 4 tuners, I doubt their order will change.
>>>>
>>>>   You may want to read about "device bonding", where you split one
>>>> cable on two tuners so they share polarisation and
>>>> band, but may be tuned to different transponders.
>>>>
>>>>   But I'm a cable user, I don't know much about it, just that there
>>>> are some people out there who use it successfully. :)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Lars.
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers Brian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> vdr mailing list
>>>>> vdr at linuxtv.org
>>>>> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> vdr mailing list
>>>> vdr at linuxtv.org
>>>> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> thanks for the tips, unfotunately I ended up needing to keep using a
>>> FF Card for a short while.
>>>
>>> So I followed the CT tip and added a TT C-2300 Cable FF card that is
>>> not connected to cable at all.
>>> That part seems to work really well.
>>>
>>> Using the -D parameter in VDR I limited VDR to using the first 4 DVB
>>> Devices and this is what it gave me:
>>>
>>> Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 0/0 provides
>>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK ("STV090x Multistandard")
>>> Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 1/0 provides DVB-C with
>>> QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 ("ST STV0297 DVB-C")
>>> Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 2/0 provides
>>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK ("STV090x Multistandard")
>>> Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 4/0 provides
>>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK ("STV090x Multistandard")
>>>
>>> So tuners 1-3 of the Cine S2 and Duoflex are now in use. DBV device 1
>>> provides nothing but MPEG output.
>>>
>>> I guess I'll keep an eye on the DVB device ordering for a while to see
>>> how it goes.
>>>
>>> Cheers Brian
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> vdr mailing list
>>> vdr at linuxtv.org
>>> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>>>
>> Hi,
>> well the DVB device numbering is not consistent:
>>
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  15:25   [995] frontend 3/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  15:25   [995] frontend 2/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  15:25   [995] frontend 1/0 provides DVB-C with
>> QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DVB"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  15:25   [995] frontend 0/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>>
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  05:10   [1018] frontend 3/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  05:10   [1018] frontend 2/0 provides DVB-C with
>> QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DV"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  05:10   [1018] frontend 1/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  05:10   [1018] frontend 0/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>>
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  06:52   [1080] frontend 3/0 provides DVB-C with
>> QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DV"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  06:52   [1080] frontend 2/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  06:52   [1080] frontend 1/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  06:52   [1080] frontend 0/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>>
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  19:16   [1015] frontend 3/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  19:16   [1015] frontend 2/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  19:16   [1015] frontend 1/0 provides DVB-C with
>> QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DV"
>> "VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2):  19:16   [1015] frontend 0/0 provides
>> DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
>>
>> Up till now it has not been a problem, the one without a cable must be
>> 4/0. Still I am wondering if this can be controlled?
>> Before VDR start unload the DVB drivers, then load DVBTTPCI first and
>> give it a short delay and then load DDBridge maybe?
>> Still, then is it then guaranteed that DDBridge will number its 4 tuners
>> correctly?
>>
>> Cheers Brian
>>
>
> Do you tried udev rules for controlling multiple DVB device numbering?
>
> br,
> Arthur
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> vdr mailing list
> vdr at linuxtv.org
> http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
>
Arthur,
No. Please tell me how?
Cheers Brian






More information about the vdr mailing list