I agree that OSD should be set to the output of the device's resolution. Not the video content it self. Would really love to see that change happen.<br><br>On 04/05/2009, <b class="gmail_sendername">Nicolas Huillard</b> <<a href="mailto:nicolas@huillard.net">nicolas@huillard.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Matthias Becker a écrit :<br> <br>> and what about anamorphic material?<br>
> A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to<br> > 16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).<br> > Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not<br> > screached by the TV?<br>
><br> > Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this topic for me.<br> <br> <br>With today's pixel-displays, we'd like to avoid all scaling, stretching,<br> etc. done by the panel itself. ie. like Rolf said, always output from<br>
the computer at panel resolution, with 1:1 pixel mapping.<br> Video would be scaled, but not the OSD.<br> <br><br> > Regards,<br> > Matthias<br> ><br> > 2009/5/4 Rolf Ahrenberg <<a href="mailto:rahrenbe@cc.hut.fi">rahrenbe@cc.hut.fi</a>>:<br>
>> On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote:<br> >><br> >>> The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is<br> >>> scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same factor.<br>
>> I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e.<br> >> 544x576) and afterwards scale up the both video and OSD to output<br> >> resolution (i.e. 1280x720), the OSD really looks crap due to scaling<br>
>> artefacts.<br> <br> <br>--<br> <br>NH<br> <br><br> _______________________________________________<br> vdr mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:vdr@linuxtv.org">vdr@linuxtv.org</a><br> <a href="http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr">http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>