Talk:Dxr3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Is support for DXR2 and similar cards meaningless?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since a Linux driver for DXR2 exists ([http://dxr2.sourceforge.net/]), would it be possible to use it with VDR?<br> |
Since a Linux driver for DXR2 exists ([http://dxr2.sourceforge.net/]), would it be possible to use it with VDR?<br> |
||
One more daring question: is there any volunteer for "recycling" the driver for use with the Cinemaster C 1.2/3.0 decoder cards? After all, it uses the same (or better) chip, namely ZiVA DS-C. The other chips are: Bt865AKPF, ZR36125PQC, TI PCM1723E, TDA7433D and Xilinx XC9536. (Cinemaster C 1.2E)<br> |
One more daring question: is there any volunteer for "recycling" the driver for use with the Cinemaster C 1.2/3.0 decoder cards? After all, it uses the same (or better) chip, namely ZiVA DS-C. The other chips are: Bt865AKPF, ZR36125PQC, TI PCM1723E, TDA7433D and Xilinx XC9536. (Cinemaster C 1.2E)<br> |
||
See [http://www.pennskog.com/cinemaster/] for details about the cards |
See [http://www.pennskog.com/cinemaster/] for details about the cards. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
--[[User:Pepax|Pepax]] 22:05, 1 March 2006 (CET) |
--[[User:Pepax|Pepax]] 22:05, 1 March 2006 (CET) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
So you have to think about wether it really makes sense to write something for really old hardware or simply bying cheap newer one. |
So you have to think about wether it really makes sense to write something for really old hardware or simply bying cheap newer one. |
||
wirbel |
wirbel |
||
| ⚫ | |||
<br> |
|||
Dunno abouth v4l compatiblity, however mplayer can output to it. I guess it accepts MPEG2 since it can play DVDs. :) I'm afraid I don't know anything about writing plugins. Is there a special page about it?<br> |
|||
Well it may make sense to people who already have it or bought it really cheap ie a lot cheaper than the price of PVR-350. (It usually costs 10 times less so buying PVR-350 only for its output IMHO doesn't make sense.)<br> |
|||
Anyway, what makes me interested in its driver is the fact that it shares most chips with Cinemaster C 1.2E which I have. There is also the 3.0 version using a newer C-Cube chip (hopefully compatible) built in many notebooks like Toshiba Portégé (7020CT) and Tecra. One guy has even started writing a driver for it [http://www.lysator.liu.se/~/joorin/cinemaster/].<br> |
|||
So I am not yet convinced it is completely useless. After all, why are there so many drivers for ancient devices in the Linux kernel? ;-)<br> |
|||
--[[User:Pepax|Pepax]] 15:58, 2 March 2006 (CET) |
|||
Revision as of 14:58, 2 March 2006
Since a Linux driver for DXR2 exists ([1]), would it be possible to use it with VDR?
One more daring question: is there any volunteer for "recycling" the driver for use with the Cinemaster C 1.2/3.0 decoder cards? After all, it uses the same (or better) chip, namely ZiVA DS-C. The other chips are: Bt865AKPF, ZR36125PQC, TI PCM1723E, TDA7433D and Xilinx XC9536. (Cinemaster C 1.2E)
See [2] for details about the cards.
--Pepax 22:05, 1 March 2006 (CET)
If that driver has v4l2 Interface it might be possible if the dxr2 accepts MPEG2. But you need to write a matching plugin too I'm afraid.
So you have to think about wether it really makes sense to write something for really old hardware or simply bying cheap newer one.
wirbel
Dunno abouth v4l compatiblity, however mplayer can output to it. I guess it accepts MPEG2 since it can play DVDs. :) I'm afraid I don't know anything about writing plugins. Is there a special page about it?
Well it may make sense to people who already have it or bought it really cheap ie a lot cheaper than the price of PVR-350. (It usually costs 10 times less so buying PVR-350 only for its output IMHO doesn't make sense.)
Anyway, what makes me interested in its driver is the fact that it shares most chips with Cinemaster C 1.2E which I have. There is also the 3.0 version using a newer C-Cube chip (hopefully compatible) built in many notebooks like Toshiba Portégé (7020CT) and Tecra. One guy has even started writing a driver for it [3].
So I am not yet convinced it is completely useless. After all, why are there so many drivers for ancient devices in the Linux kernel? ;-)
--Pepax 15:58, 2 March 2006 (CET)