Difference between revisions of "Development: How to submit patches"

From LinuxTVWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Patch Preparation: correct my goodly English)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
:* Document your work where appropriate (i.e. in the form of patches to the Documentation/video4linux or Documentation/dvb files)  
 
:* Document your work where appropriate (i.e. in the form of patches to the Documentation/video4linux or Documentation/dvb files)  
 
:* Add a '''Signed-off-by: Your name <name@yoursite.com>''' as a [[Development: Submitting Patches#Developer.27s_Certificate_of_Origin_1.1|Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 ]]
 
:* Add a '''Signed-off-by: Your name <name@yoursite.com>''' as a [[Development: Submitting Patches#Developer.27s_Certificate_of_Origin_1.1|Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 ]]
:* Send the patch inline, not as an attachment (unless asked to do so otherwise) ... patches presented in the form of inline text in the body of an email are easier to deal with from the perspective of a peer review process (for more information, see the <code>/usr/src/linux/Documentation/email-clients.txt</code> file; a current copy of which can also be found online [http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.28.5/Documentation/email-clients.txt here]).
+
:* Send the patch inline, not as an attachment (unless otherwise asked to do so) ... patches presented in the form of inline text in the body of an email are easier to deal with from the perspective of a peer review process (for more information, see the <code>/usr/src/linux/Documentation/email-clients.txt</code> file; a current copy of which can also be found online [http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.28.5/Documentation/email-clients.txt here]).
 
:* '''Note''': various web mail interfaces seem to be problematic for patch submissionn, in that:
 
:* '''Note''': various web mail interfaces seem to be problematic for patch submissionn, in that:
 
:** they may break the patch (e.g. line wrapping it) or
 
:** they may break the patch (e.g. line wrapping it) or
 
:** in the case where you have sent the patch as an attachment, the emailer may use the wrong mime encoding type ... (web mailers often wrongly use "application/octet-stream" for diffs, whereas the proper type is "text/x-patch" ... Note: the patchwork tool (discussed below) is robust in that it supports both mime types "text/x-patch" and "text/plain", but if the emailer has sent it with a different type, the attachment will be disregarded/discarded.
 
:** in the case where you have sent the patch as an attachment, the emailer may use the wrong mime encoding type ... (web mailers often wrongly use "application/octet-stream" for diffs, whereas the proper type is "text/x-patch" ... Note: the patchwork tool (discussed below) is robust in that it supports both mime types "text/x-patch" and "text/plain", but if the emailer has sent it with a different type, the attachment will be disregarded/discarded.
  
Hint: There is also a [[Development: Linux Kernel patch submittal checklist|checklist for patch submission]]  
+
Hint: There is also a [[Development: Linux Kernel patch submittal checklist|checklist for patch submission]]
  
 
== After you've Submitted: What happens Next? ==
 
== After you've Submitted: What happens Next? ==

Revision as of 23:19, 12 April 2009

This article provides an overview for submitting patches against the V4L-DVB source code (for either new or existing kernel driver modules and/or documentation), and as well as for the dvb-apps source. For general references in regards as to how to develop support for a particular device or in writing a new device driver, see here.

Patch Preparation

For V4L-DVB driver modules and/or documentation, patches should be created against the master V4L-DVB mercurial tree; for instructions on obtaining and building these sources, see the "How to Obtain, Build and Install V4L-DVB Device Drivers" article. Similarly, for submissions related to the dvb-apps, one should patch against the dvb-apps mercurial tree.

Post your patches to the linux-media mailing list for review and testing. Subscription to the mailing list is recommended, though it is not required.

Follow the guidelines in Submitting Patches (cf. jgarzik's version), including:

  • Verify best-practice kernel coding style
  • Use [PATCH] in the subject line to get attention, as well as to help ensure that the patchwork tracking tool picks up your submission
  • Explain what the patch does and to what hardware it applies. Note: All comments you add on your patch will be part of the commit message (except for the meta-tags)
  • Document your work where appropriate (i.e. in the form of patches to the Documentation/video4linux or Documentation/dvb files)
  • Add a Signed-off-by: Your name <name@yoursite.com> as a Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
  • Send the patch inline, not as an attachment (unless otherwise asked to do so) ... patches presented in the form of inline text in the body of an email are easier to deal with from the perspective of a peer review process (for more information, see the /usr/src/linux/Documentation/email-clients.txt file; a current copy of which can also be found online here).
  • Note: various web mail interfaces seem to be problematic for patch submissionn, in that:
    • they may break the patch (e.g. line wrapping it) or
    • in the case where you have sent the patch as an attachment, the emailer may use the wrong mime encoding type ... (web mailers often wrongly use "application/octet-stream" for diffs, whereas the proper type is "text/x-patch" ... Note: the patchwork tool (discussed below) is robust in that it supports both mime types "text/x-patch" and "text/plain", but if the emailer has sent it with a different type, the attachment will be disregarded/discarded.

Hint: There is also a checklist for patch submission

After you've Submitted: What happens Next?

In conjunction with the move to the new Linux-media mailing list, V4L-DVB is now using the Patchwork tool for aggregating patches sent into the list (you can read more about it here). In the past, it was, unfortunately, not uncommon for patches to be overlooked and become lost on the V4L-DVB mailing lists; thus making the adoption of the patchwork tool a very welcome addition. So, provided you have correctly submitted your patch (as discussed above), the steps towards having your code adopted will have automatically been put into motion. You can, of course, check to see the status of your submission from the Patchwork webpage. If patchwork has not picked up your patch, it stands to reason that your submission was incorrect for some reason; please review the information contained in the above section and try again.

The first thing you should expect next is that a code review will be performed, and often this is by various parties. This may lead to a series of requests for you to fix any observed problems and require you to then resubmit your work, by repeating the steps outlined above, until everyone is happy with the submission. In other words: wash, rinse, repeat ;)

Then, when your patch is accepted, it will initially be applied to the main V4L-DVB mercurial tree. Once tested and integrated, such patches are later merged into a git tree by the V4L-DVB maintainer and, upon request, periodically pulled by Linus into one of his git trees for an intermediate step towards inclusion into the Linux kernel.