Template:USB Device Data: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Data: used template for support in kernel) |
|||
| Line 380: | Line 380: | ||
| vendor=[[LifeView]] |
| vendor=[[LifeView]] |
||
| device=[[LifeView TV Walker Twin DVB-T (LR540)|TV Walker Twin DVB-T (LR540)]] |
| device=[[LifeView TV Walker Twin DVB-T (LR540)|TV Walker Twin DVB-T (LR540)]] |
||
| supported= |
| supported={{Supported_in_Kernel|version=2.6.22}}(one tuner)<br/>{{Supported_in_Kernel|version=2.6.23}}(both tuners) |
||
| pic=[[image:LifeView TV Walker Twin.jpg|120px]] |
| pic=[[image:LifeView TV Walker Twin.jpg|120px]] |
||
| url= |
| url= |
||
| Line 392: | Line 392: | ||
| comment= |
| comment= |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Supported_in_Kernel|version=2.6.25}} |
|||
</includeonly> |
</includeonly> |
||
Revision as of 08:40, 30 April 2009
Full Detail Table
| Vendor | Device/Model | Supported | Pictures | URL | Interface | USB ID | Hardware | Tuner | Demodulator | USB Bridge | Firmware | Comment | E
✔ Yes, in kernel since {{{since}}} |
|---|
Semantics
| "renderwith" | is the template that the data is passed to for rendering (a table row) |
| "vendor" | the device manufacturer/vendor. E.g. Hauppauge |
| "device" | the device name. E.g. Cinergy XXS |
| "supported" | support status. {{yes}} or {{no}} if there is no further detail but I'd prefer something like
{{Supported_in_Kernel|version=2.6.25}} if supported by vanilla kernel since "version"
{{Supported_in_HG|since=2009-01-31}} for support in main line mercurial repository
{{Supported_in_HG_Branch|since=2009-01-31|branchurl=http://linuxtv.org/hg/~anttip/af9015/}}
{{Supported_in_External|since=2009-01-31|url=http://mcentral.de/wiki/index.php5/Em2880}}
|
| "pic" | preferably an image uploaded to the wiki. using 120px width |
| "url" | url to the manufacturers/vendors page for that device |
| "type" | interface supported. E.g. USB1.1 or USB2.0 (put USB1.1 first if the device supports both) |
| "hw" | summary of the hardware (human readable) |
| "usb id" | usb id (still not sure if we should have this machine readable.
it would mean only one id per entry and could lead to a lot of duplicated entries. |
|
machine readable component names for implementing filters based on this in the future. E.g. af9015, vt7045, mt2060 |
| "fw" | firmware name. link? |
| "comment" | human readable comments |
Data
Here is a cut'n paste template for new devices.
{{{{{renderwith}}}
| vendor=
| device=
| supported=
| pic=
| url=
| type=
| usbid=
| hw=
| tuner=
| demodulator=
| usbbridge=
| fw=
| comment=
}}