> Gregoire Favre wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:39PM +0200, Andreas Share wrote: > > > > > If you like some little bit faster tuning, you could try to remove the afc > > > correction from ves1x93.c > > > > Hello to all, > > > > I have now tested the patch from Andreas Share for a lots of time and I > > can say I don't have any UPT anymore and all my reccording are perfectly > > "vdrconert.pl"able which is very conveniant :-) > > > > So my question : any reason not to include it in the CVS ? > > I lost track of this thread :-(, and I also hoped that the > authors of the ves1x93 driver would comment on this. > > If someone sends me a clean patch which applies to > current CVS and doesn't break things for me, then I > will apply it. Hi, the patch should not break anything, ´cause only the delay´s are higher and the charge pump current is used for the ves1893 only. Maybe the new dvb_delay´s are to high, but the current dvb_delay(5); is for most setups to low and caused multiple dvb_frontend tune attempt`s. Andreas
Attachment:
ves1x93_cpc.V3.diff
Description: Binary data