Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vdr] Re: Maxtor 160 GB



Ist mit dem Handbuch eigentlich kein Problem einen eigenen kernel zu backen.

Das patchen ist im Idealfall auch bloß eine Sekundensache, bloß blöd wenn der 
Patch nicht 100% angewendet wird (wenn .rej-Dateien erzeugt werden), dann 
müßte man von Hand ran, gehen wir aber mal nicht vom schlimmsten aus:

patch downloaden root werden und nach /usr/src/linux kopieren
hinwechseln und folgendes eintippen:

>patch -p1 <dateiname

ggf. bestätigen.

>make xconfig
eintippen und zunmindest mal die CPU wählen, wär nicht schlecht durch die 
Optionen durchzugehen und die Hilfe durchzulesen - bei denen wo Du sicher 
bist ändern (aber wirklich nur die ;-)

>make dep
>make bzImage
>make modules

wenn keine Fehler:

>make bzlilo
>make modules_install

neuen kernel booten...

On Sunday, 3. March 2002 11:10, Ralf Spitzauer wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carsten.Koch@icem.de [mailto:Carsten.Koch@icem.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 2:30 PM
> > To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> > Subject: [vdr] Re: Maxtor 160 GB
> >
> >
> > Ralf Spitzauer wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > > A new controller is NOT needed, you only need the 48-bit
> > > > LBA kernel patch (or a kerner that has 48-bit LBA already).
> > > > Marco, you wasted your 78 EUR. With the patch, the 160GB
> > > > disk works full size on most newer controllers.
> > >
> > > I ´haven´t install such a patch but I have full capacity (153GB in
> > > KdiskFree) with Kernel 2.4.10
> > > Do I need the patch or a newer kernel?
> >
> > I do not know.
> > The SuSE 2.4.10 kernel may have the patch in it already.
> > SuSE ships a higly-modified kernel with their distribution,
> > so I do not know what is in it. The patch is NOT in the
> > standard <= 2.4.17 kernels. It first showed up in the -ac
> > series. I am not sure if it made it into standard 2.4.18?
> >
> > If my disk test below completes a full 153GB write and read pass
> > on your 153GB disk, you are all set with whatever you have.
>
> Disk test competed that night. Here´s the result:
>
> Writing.
> 156334 MB.
> Write complete - No space left on device.
>  163928604672 bytes in 18555.9 seconds = 8.42502 MB/s.
> Reading.
>
> Data error: 137438961408 != 7936. Exit.
>
> I think now it´s for shure that I need a newer kernel or a patch when I
> whant to use full Capacity.
> Unfortunatly I´m nearly a Linux Newbee. I´ve never build a kernel by myself
> and I never patched a kernel. So I need some help or I have to wait for a
> SuSe-Update or new Version.
>
> Thank you very much for helping with this stuff.
>
> > > > So I strongly recommend to run a disk test that writes
> > > > and verifies every byte and uses different contents.
> > > > badblocks was not able to find these errors, so I wrote
> > > > my own test which did find the problem.
> > >
> > > Where I can find such a disk test?
> >
> > Here:
> >
> > /*  Disk surface test and benchmark.
> >     Carsten Koch, January 2002.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index