Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vdr] Re: genindex with LFS (was: Working genindex for VDR (included))

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: genindex with LFS (was: Working genindex for VDR (included))
From: "Rienecker, Fa. Evenio, ITS P, M" <C.Rienecker@deutschepost.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:47:16 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org

Just give me one good reason:
Why do you need LFS for vdr ???

VDR spreads recordings to multiple files seemlessly.

CU,
Christian.

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: genindex with LFS
  - From: Florian Steinel <florian.steinel@t-online.de>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Allcam ade ?
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: genindex with LFS
Prev by thread: [vdr] Re: genindex with LFS (was: Working genindex for VDR (included))
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: genindex with LFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index