[vdr] AW: Re: AW: Re: OT: Reply indicators (was: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: Are 2 dvb-s card with 1 ci each now working?)

[nisele@t-online.de (Nikolaus Isele)]

Thanx ---> Settings changed.

cu Niko

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org]Im Auftrag
> von Andy Grobb
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Februar 2002 21:53
> An: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Betreff: [vdr] Re: AW: Re: OT: Reply indicators (was: Re: AW: Re: AW:
> Re: Are 2 dvb-s card with 1 ci each now working?)
>
>
> Hello, extra -> option -> email format -> internationale option ->
> nachrichtenkennzeichen in english
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
> [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org]On Behalf Of
> Nikolaus Isele
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 9:45 PM
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] AW: Re: OT: Reply indicators (was: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re:
> Are 2 dvb-s card with 1 ci each now working?)
>
>
> If you can say to me where i can change this in Outlook 2000,
> i'll do it.
>
> Niko
>
> > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
> [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org]Im Auftrag
> > von Matthias Queisler
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Februar 2002 16:10
> > An: vdr@linuxtv.org
> > Betreff: [vdr] Re: OT: Reply indicators (was: Re: AW: Re: AW:
> > Re: Are 2
> > dvb-s card with 1 ci each now working?)
> >
> >
> > maybe because not everybody knows how to do this....
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
> > [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org]On Behalf Of
> > Thomas Koch
> > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 3:45 PM
> > To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> > Subject: [vdr] Re: OT: Reply indicators (was: Re: AW: Re: AW:
> > Re: Are 2
> > dvb-s card with 1 ci each now working?)
> >
> >
> >
> > Am Sonntag den, 10. Februar 2002, um 15:35, schrieb Klaus
> Schmidinger:
> >
> > > So could those who don't use an English mail client
> PLEASE set their
> > > client so that it uses the standard "Re: " as a reply indicator?!
> >
> > You are talking against a wall.
> >
> > Ciao, Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>