[vdr] Re: Fw: Re: Nagravision decryption

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: Fw: Re: Nagravision decryption
From: Alessio Sangalli <alesan@manoweb.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:30:47 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
References: <00e201c1e4e1$b2fbb760$6600a8c0@pcmac>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020313

Stefaan Coddé wrote:

>>AFAIK There's indeed a Nagravision version that can be used with digital
>>transmission and if there are software decoders available then don't use
>>them cause it's 100% ILLEGAL to do so.

we've already discussed this topic and this is only your personal opinion.

we also proposed not to talk about this on the mailing list, please...

bye
as

References:
- [vdr] Fw: Re: Nagravision decryption
  - From: Stefaan Coddé <Stefaan.Codde@pandora.be>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: Experimental Live Streaming Patch for VDR 1.0.0
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: what language is this page in?
Prev by thread: [vdr] Fw: Re: Nagravision decryption
Next by thread: [vdr] Fw: Re: Automatic startup of vdr
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index