[vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org,Sergei Haller <Sergei.Haller@math.uni-giessen.de>
Subject: [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
From: Andreas Roedl <flood@flood-net.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:41:28 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
In-Reply-To: <200204190037.58288.flood@flood-net.de>
Organization: Flood-Net
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204190027450.26252-100000@fb07-calculator.math.uni-giessen.de> <200204190037.58288.flood@flood-net.de>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org

Hello!

Am Freitag, 19. April 2002 00:37 schrieb Andreas Roedl:
> Hallo!
>
> Am Freitag, 19. April 2002 00:29 schrieb Sergei Haller:
> > This was a patch over vdr-1.0.0pre5. Didn't it get into 1.0.0?
>
> Yes.

That was ambiguous :-) I mean: Yes, this has been merged to 1.0.0. :-)

Sorry

Andi

-- 
Web:   http://www.flood-net.de/
Mail:  flood@flood-net.de
Phone: +49-(0)-30-680577-44
Windows sucks, Linux rules :-) http://srom.zgp.org/
Who needs DivX?             telnet blinkenlights.nl

References:
- [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
  - From: Sergei Haller <Sergei.Haller@math.uni-giessen.de>
- [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
  - From: Andreas Roedl <flood@flood-net.de>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
Prev by thread: [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: Still frames bug in vdr 1.0.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index