Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
From: ma.hoff@t-online.de (Martin Hoffmann)
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 13:16:54 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Delivered-To: mhonarc@limes.convergence.de
In-Reply-To: <20020503110539.GG14096@casper.aon.at>
References: <20020503110539.GG14096@casper.aon.at>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org

> - The more severe reason is that if I look for example 6 hours
>   TV per day, but the driver is loaded always the lifetime of
>   the LNB and the DVB card would be decreased to 1/4.
Are you sure that the DVBs card lives longer if you unload the drivers ?
Maybe if you power off your PC, but as this is still running the card is 
powered up - driver loaded or not !??

Or am i wrong ?

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: "Ulrich Petri" <ulope@gmx.de>

References:
- [vdr] What about an passive mode of VDR?
  - From: Martin Neuditschko <yosuke.tomoe@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: [vdr] What about an passive mode of VDR?
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Prev by thread: [vdr] What about an passive mode of VDR?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: What about an passive mode of VDR?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index