[vdr] Re: 1.1.13 - simple diseqc question

[alfred.zastrow@t-online.de (Alfred Zastrow)]

Dariush Forouher wrote:

> >Try this one...
>
> You config doesn't work for me, but this does:
> S19.2E  11700 V  9750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 t
> S19.2E  99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 T
> S19.2E  11700 H  9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 t
> S19.2E  99999 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 T
> S13E    11700 V  9750 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 t
> S13E    99999 V 10600 t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 T
> S13E    11700 H  9750 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 t
> S13E    99999 H 10600 t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 T
>
> Thanks, I had never tried changing the last byte in the codeblock, 
> looks quite obviously now.

Ohhh, if your switch only understand voltage- and tone-signals this 
should be enough:

S19.2E  11700 V  9750 t v  t
S19.2E  99999 V 10600 t v  T
S19.2E  11700 H  9750 t V  t
S19.2E  99999 H 10600 t V  T
S13E    11700 V  9750 t v  t
S13E    99999 V 10600 t v  T
S13E    11700 H  9750 t V  t
S13E    99999 H 10600 t V  T

(Not tested, ich have a Diseq 2.0 switch)

Alfred



-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.