[vdr] Recording on different partitions seems to be broken

[Steffen Barszus <st_barszus@gmx.de>]

Hi !

First of all some data:

vdr-1.1.15 compiled with VFAT=1
dvb-driver from cvs from yesterday
no plugins started
2 fat32-partitions , where the recordings should go to.
1 Siemens Rev 1.3 card

The fat32 partitions are mounted under /mnt/win_d and /mnt/win_e. I've made 2 
softlinks:

ln -s /mnt/win_d /video0
ln -s /mnt/win_e /video1

started than vdr trough './runvdr -v /video0' results in that vdr use both 
partitions and shows me a possible recording time of around 9 h. So far so 
good. But recordings aren't successfull in these environment.

I had made 3 timers and let vdr cut after 1000 MB:

timer 1: 1000 MB are recorded , there exist only 001.vdr 
	   and summary,indexand so on and nothing else.
timer 2: only summary.vdr are in that dir
timer 3: the same as in timer 2

/var/log/messages :

vdr[14755]: timer 13 start
vdr[14755]: record /video0/nano/2002-11-04.14.20.50.50.rec
vdr[15071]: ERROR: /video0/nano/2002-11-04.14.20.50.50.rec/002.vdr: Operation 
not permitted
vdr[15071]: ERROR: /video0/nano/2002-11-04.14.20.50.50.rec/002.vdr: Operation 
not permitted
vdr[15072]: ERROR: ring buffer overflow (65 bytes dropped)
vdr[15072]: ERROR: ring buffer overflow (188 bytes dropped)
vdr[15072]: ERROR: ring buffer overflow (188 bytes dropped)
...

These "operation not permitted" seems to kick in then vdr tries to write the 
second file (002.vdr) and then it isn't possible to do further recordings.

Further I checked if the problem is gone than I delete the video1 symlink. 
After doing that , no probs at all. 

I hope it's understandable what I 've written ;o). 

Could it be that the symlinking breaks something ? 
Is it a bug ? 
Have I did something wrong ? 

Greets

Steffen


--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to listar@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.