[vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
From: Gregoire Favre <greg@magma.unil.ch>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:09:00 +0200
Content-disposition: inline
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
In-reply-to: <3EF19727.1010106@koschikode.com>
References: <20030619093456.GA13009@magma.unil.ch> <3EF19727.1010106@koschikode.com>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:57:43PM +0200, Juri Haberland wrote:

> I might be wrong, but IIRC the DVB-S rev. 2.1 has no J2.

Hasn't it an integrated SPDIF?

	Grégoire
__________________________________________________________________
http://www-ima.unil.ch/greg ICQ:16624071 mailto:greg@magma.unil.ch


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
  - From: Juri Haberland <juri@koschikode.com>
- [vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
  - From: Martin Theodor Grewe <m.grewe@gmx.de>

References:
- [vdr] SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
  - From: Gregoire Favre <greg@magma.unil.ch>
- [vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
  - From: Juri Haberland <juri@koschikode.com>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: feature request for 1.3
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: vdr-dvd-0.3.3: What's new?
Previous by thread: [vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: SPDIF with rev 1.3 better than 2.1, or?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index