[vdr] Re: Timer priority bug?

[Klaus Schmidinger <Klaus.Schmidinger@cadsoft.de>]

Jürgen Schmitz wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> After making some changes and tests with the analogTV plugin with the
> priority handling (which results in a fix ;-) I found a problem with the
> timer handling in the VDR core - maybe:
> 
> When a first timer eg. with prio 10 startes recording and after some
> minutes a 2nd timer with a higher prio starts and requires the same
> device the first one is stopped - that's ok. But when the 2nd is
> recording the first one tries nearly every second to get the (or any)
> device to continue its recording. This looks like useless CPU stress.

Is this just an observation from looking at the source code or can
you measure an actual increase in CPU load for this?

Klaus


-- 
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.