[vdr] Re: VDR fails to build (because of time.h inconsistency?)

To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] Re: VDR fails to build (because of time.h inconsistency?)
From: Thomas Schmidt <thomas.schmidt@in.stud.tu-ilmenau.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:18:11 +0100
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs"
In-reply-to: <87fzfhumro.fsf@mufasa.vip.fi>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@linuxtv.org?Subject=help>
List-id: vdr <vdr.mail.convergence2.de>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-unsubscribe: <https://mail.convergence2.de/cgi-bin/listen.cgi>
References: <87fzfhumro.fsf@mufasa.vip.fi>
Reply-to: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sender: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

Hi

This is a problem with the package linux-kernel-headers, it is
allready fixed in unstable, so you should try the package from
unstable.

Regards
Thomas

-- 
Thomas Schmidt
:wq

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- [vdr] Re: VDR fails to build (because of time.h inconsistency?)
  - From: Patrick Cernko <errror@ps.uni-sb.de>

References:
- [vdr] VDR fails to build (because of time.h inconsistency?)
  - From: Paavo Hartikainen <pahartik@sci.fi>

Prev by Date: [vdr] Re: DECT-Problems... again... :(
Next by Date: [vdr] Re: DECT-Problems... again... :(
Previous by thread: [vdr] Re: VDR fails to build (because of time.h inconsistency?)
Next by thread: [vdr] Re: VDR fails to build (because of time.h inconsistency?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index