[vdr] Re: VDR developer version 1.3.6

["Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <PrakashKC@gmx.de>]

Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Marcel Wiesweg wrote:
>
> > Am Sonntag, 25. April 2004 12:23 schrieb Prakash K. Cheemplavam:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I just tried to make a quick compilation fix for gcc3.4. I am not sure,
> > > whether the fixes are right, so please take a look and then merge. It
> > > compiles, but I have not done a test-run.
> > Here is another tested suggestion.
> > The first is a matter of taste - in their changelog however, the propose to
> > use "this->" for members of dependent base classes in dependent classes.
>
> I have to admit that I don't quite understand where the problem is here.
> Why doesn't
>
>   T *l = (T *)First();
>
> work any more? After all, there is no other item named "First" anywhere near.
> What am I missing?
>
> Klaus
As I am no coding expert, I just give the gcc error:

In file included from channels.h:13,
                 from channels.c:10:
config.h: In member function `bool cConfig<T>::Save()':
config.h:143: Fehler: there are no arguments to `First' that depend on a 
template parameter, so a declaration of `First' must be available
config.h:143: Fehler: (if you use `-fpermissive', G++ will accept your 
code, but allowing the use of an undeclared name is deprecated)
make: *** [channels.o] Fehler 1


Prakash


--
Info:
To unsubscribe send a mail to ecartis@linuxtv.org with "unsubscribe vdr" as subject.