Mailing List archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[vdr] Re: VDSB solved, need fix...



Vladimir Shved wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounce@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of
Klaus Schmidinger
...
 > > card? Need some sort of diseqc sniffer tool? Sorry I'm very new at this

and

know nothing about it.
I find it very strange that a DiSEqC switch would react to control signals
that come in through its LNB inputs. I'd certainly call this "broken".

I guess all diseqc switches in US are broken, I think it's most likely is a
feature ..:)
In a configuration like the one you have described, where one LNB is
connected to two DiSEqC switches, apparently the signals sent to one switch
are propagated to the other switch via the LNB. What puzzles me is why
a switch would even listen to DiSEqC commands at its LNB _input_ - I would
think that it whould only listen to such commands at its receiver _output_.

Diseqc v2.0 allows bi-directional communications, while diseqc 1.2 only
one

way. This should allow controlling individual diseqc switches, either in
parallel or in cascaded operations. I believe everyone in US is using
parallel operation in multi-card setup.
With the proper DiSEqC sequences it should be no problem to address
individual switches, even with DiSEqc 1.

Klaus

Again, I'm not very familiar with diseqc sequences and if protocol v1 can do
it, I think it should solve the problem. It sounds impossible to control
each individual diseqc switch when all switches are listening. It still will
require separate diseqc config files for each DVB card though, correct?

	--Vlad
Well, apparently they _are_ both always listening.
Do these switches have any kind of "address" that can be set individually?
IMHO that would be a first requirement if separate DiSEqC definitions per
DVB card should even have a chance to work.

At any rate, a "clean" multiswitch setup seems a lot better to me ;-)

Klaus




Home | Main Index | Thread Index