<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/15/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael Krufky</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I think this is just a matter of PCI bandwidth. A single machine can<br>only handle so much data passing along it's PCI bus at a time.<br><br>-Mike<br></blockquote></div><br>
Thanks for the reply... I'm not trying to challenge the idea,
just to be educated by the folks on the list who are obviously much
more knowledgable than myself regarding these topics.
Should there be a difference between the PVR-350 and the PVR-500 PCI
bandwidth? I can capture with both tuners of the PVR-500 at the
same time as the FusionHDTV 5 lite and nothing is corrupt.
Recording with the single tuner of the PVR-350 at the same time as the
FusionHDTV 5 lite gives corrupt recordings... Other data points,
from a similar post to the mythtv list suggested that one person was
able to capture 4 HDTV streams concurrently with no corruption...
Any insight you can provide is welcome. Thanks,<br>