[media-workshop] V2: Agenda for the Edinburgh mini-summit
sakari.ailus at iki.fi
Sat Sep 28 00:07:34 CEST 2013
Hi Hans and Laurent,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:39:11PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:24:25 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Tue 24 September 2013 12:59:44 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 10 September 2013 11:34:32 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > I have collected all the ideas up to now in a V2 of the agenda.
> > > >
> > > > The items are grouped by the person(s) that suggested them. As done in
> > > > the past those who suggested a topic and who will attend the mini-summit
> > > > are expected to prepare for it, perhaps making a (very) small
> > > > presentation if necessary.
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > As it stands I don't think it will be possible to handle it all in one
> > > > day. In particular the codec problem as mentioned by Oliver et al needs
> > > > a lot of time. Should we set aside a separate day for just this? October
> > > > 21 or 22 would work for me. I would really like to get some feedback on
> > > > this. If we decide to go for a second day for this topic, then I can see
> > > > if I can get a room. It looks like there is a lot of interest in getting
> > > > this sorted, so brainstorming for a day might be quite useful.
> > >
> > > I believe a second day would indeed be very useful. As the ARM kernel
> > > summit will take place on the 22nd and 23rd, I would vote for
> > > brainstorming on the 21st.
> > I'm working on the agenda and I think we have enough time to go through
> > all the items in one day. It would be great if you can be present for either
> > the morning or afternoon for the mini-summit. I have about 4 hours worth of
> > topics for which your input would be much appreciated.
> The ARM KS agenda hasn't been published yet, so I can't tell when I'll be
> available. I've CC'ed you on an e-mail to Olof regarding this.
> > I would be happy to add another brainstorming day, but since Hugues won't be
> > available on the 21st we can only do limited codec discussions, so we would
> > need other topics as well. Proposals are welcome.
Sounds like a good idea to me. I haven't been in the meetings for a while
but in the past the tendency has often been that there's more to discuss
that what there's time for.
> Brainstorming a property-based API is one topic that would benefit from longer
> discussions. I'm also always free to discuss CDF and how it would be related
What an excellent idea! :)
> with V4L2 in the future :-)
e-mail: sakari.ailus at iki.fi XMPP: sailus at retiisi.org.uk
More information about the media-workshop