[vdr] Concerns about changing the API-definition of 'cStatus::Replaying()' and 'cStatus::Recording()' of VDR?

Udo Richter udo_richter at gmx.de
Fri Dec 16 01:27:27 CET 2005

Sascha Volkenandt wrote:
> Currently, there are large problems wanting to identify where a replay comes 
> from, especially if the replay doesn't have a filename in that sense. I could 
> imagine that a DVD replay announces itself as "dvd://1", so we could use 
> common URI naming schemes instead of defining one ourselves for things other 
> as normal files.

Well, on a very long term. This could even go that far to start playing
an URI, and VDR checks which plugin can play it back. Different plugins
could use one generic VDR playback sources dialog, instead of each
having its own file selector.

> Example application:
> An extension to the trayopen plugin shall open the tray when the drive's 
> button is pressed. Unfortunately, for this to happen, a replay from that 
> drive must be stopped and the disk must be unmounted prior to ejecting.

DVD plugin and trayopen plugin could agree on a protocol using the
Service() interface. Something like 'DVD plugin, are you replaying?' or
'could all players stop using /dev/dvd please?'



More information about the vdr mailing list