[vdr] ScanVideoDir is holding back VDR for up to 15min at
schierz at vschierz.de
Sun Apr 16 19:25:52 CEST 2006
first, saying VDR is a VDR and nothing else is OK for me (I'll do it on
Second, that separated thread is nice, but an illusion. Cause it gains
as much Disk-Access,
nothing else will be done beside of it. So, why not reduce it to the max
in findind recordings
as as quick as possible.
Just my thoughts. Thanks for that quick response.
From: vdr-bounces at linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces at linuxtv.org] On Behalf
Of Klaus Schmidinger
Sent: Sonntag, 16. April 2006 14:58
To: vdr at linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] ScanVideoDir is holding back VDR for up to 15min at
Volker Schierz wrote:
> I think there will be no problems on single disk systems cause of they
> have enough speed, but I found a Problem with external NFS-Devices.
> Beside my internal video-device I'm using one harddisk for Music, one
> for all of my Image's and an additional Device for VDR-Recordings.
> Cause of the slower network-access the initial scanning for recordings
> and empty directories, VDR
> is scanning all that Sound and Image-Stuff for several minutes. If I
> include my 4 GB cddb-archiv, it is about 20 minutes.
> Therefor I changed the code of ScanVideoDir with a simple extension.
> It now looks first wether a file ".vdrexclude" Exists. If so it skips
> the entire directory-tree. This makes it easy to exclude a
> subdirectory tree by simply touching ".vdrexclude" in a directory that
> will not contain VDR-Recordings.
Well, actually there shouldn't be any non-VDR files in the video
directory. Plus, since version 1.3.38 all disk access regarding
recordings is done in a separate thread.
vdr mailing list
vdr at linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
More information about the vdr