[vdr] Digit buttons in cMenuEditStrItem work poorly
marko.makela at hut.fi
Thu Apr 27 23:02:38 CEST 2006
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:00:02PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Marko Mäkelä may or may not have written...
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:15:15PM +0300, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> >>> I just tested with my RCU here and everything worked fine. Maybe it's a
> >>> problem with the <linux/input.h> driver or the vdr-softdevice plugin?
> >> It turned out that something falsely sets the k_Repeat flag most of the
> >> time. It's most probably the patches to the cx88-input.c, by Darren Salt
> >> and me. I'll investigate later.
> > Also the vanilla cx88-input.c in linux-188.8.131.52 is buggy and sets the
> > repeat flag when it shouldn't (when a button is pressed in rapid
> > succession). I'll try to come up with a working kernel patch later.
> In the Hauppauge section of the switch block in cx88_ir_irq, watch for the
> state of bit 11 of ircode being changed between successive reads. I'll stick
> something in my patchset...
Rather than watching the toggle bit, I'd compare whole codes. It leads to
a simpler program, and it avoids losing events. For instance, if three
buttons are pressed, A, B, and C, and the code for B is lost, then watching
only the toggle bit would cause all events for C to be discarded.
FWIW, the culprit was not the patched cx88-input.c, but instead the RCU
would not flip the toggle bit when a button is pressed in rapid succession.
So, it would misreport rapid keypress events as repeat events.
My patch against 184.108.40.206 applies cleanly on 220.127.116.11 and fixes
the problem. It is a quick hack, because it modifies ir-common.c,
wrongly assuming that the parameter ir_raw contains a RC5 code word.
Please consider incorporating a similar fix to your patchset.
More information about the vdr