[vdr] [PATCH] limit streamdev client's ringbuffer timeouts to more sane values

Stone syphyr at gmail.com
Sat Apr 7 06:36:10 CEST 2007

> I tried the 1us -> (1000|10000)us sleep approach first, before using the
> ringbuffer timeouts -- saw no noticeable difference wrt performance.
> 10ms timeouts seemed to be enough (it's the resolution of a HZ==100
> kernel)
> and gave similar interrupt and cs numbers as w/ low-res timers.

Is this patch for streamdev a direct result from selecting the new "Tickless
System (Dynamic Ticks)" option in kernel 2.6.21?  If yes, then does the new
"dynamic" timer effect vdr's performance as well?

Best Regards.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/attachments/20070406/1d6ab33e/attachment.htm

More information about the vdr mailing list