R: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends
eddi at depieri.net
Fri Feb 9 14:27:48 CET 2007
Ok, I hope that what I have done, may describe the algorithm that I think
may be necessary to get multiple frontend working.
I know that the solution I choose are not the best and right, I'm not a c++
The only solution I found to close all file descriptors and
/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0 was to add the close fd_frontend to the dvb
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: vdr-bounces at linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces at linuxtv.org] Per conto di
> Klaus Schmidinger
> Inviato: venerdì 9 febbraio 2007 13.43
> A: vdr at linuxtv.org
> Oggetto: Re: [PATCH]: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends
> Eddi wrote:
> > So what do you think should be the right way?
> I haven't decided yet how to do that.
> I just wanted to let you know that deleting the cDvbDevice
> is not the way to go - especially if you delete it from within
> one of its own member functions ;-) It's no wonder your patched
> version fails it you saw off the branch you're sitting on.
> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
> >> Da: vdr-bounces at linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-bounces at linuxtv.org] Per conto
> >> Klaus Schmidinger
> >> Inviato: venerdì 9 febbraio 2007 8.27
> >> A: vdr at linuxtv.org
> >> Oggetto: Re: R: [PATCH] R: R: [vdr] VDR & Multiple frontends
> >> Eddi wrote:
> >>> I need help....
> >>> This is why sometimes hangs after my patch...
> >>> On ProvidesChannel I delete the cDvbDevice and i make it again.
> >> Deleting the cDvbDevice is definitely the wrong way to do this.
> >> Klaus
> vdr mailing list
> vdr at linuxtv.org
More information about the vdr